The vaccinations against Covid-19 will go down in history as one of the biggest pharmaceutical scandals that has ever taken place on this planet. It is part of a long history which, in addition to greed for profit, is primarily about the dream of conquering the world and on which the Great Reset is based.
The Great Reset has been in preparation for 100 years. The “Great Reset” promoted by politicians and corporations around the world is the continuation of long-standing developments. The coronavirus only serves to turn the ideas of the global elites into reality more quickly.
Remember that the Great Reset is an old idea that is only presented to us in a new guise. In principle, the Great Reset involves expanding the power of globalists who have long dreamed of conquering the world. Anyone who calls this a conspiracy theory has not been informed.
What everyone should know about the pharmaceutical (and oil) industry
On May 15, 1911, the US Supreme Court found John Rockefeller and his trust company guilty of corruption, illicit business practices and organized crime. The entire Rockefeller Standard Oil Trust – the world’s largest business corporation at the time – was doomed to be smashed. At that point, Rockefeller had leverage because of his money and didn’t care about the verdict.
In 1913, to distract the public and to escape the political pressure that weighed on Rockefeller and other unscrupulous magnates, the trick of “philanthropy” was resorted to: illegal proceeds were transferred to establish the Rockefeller Foundation and the money thus washed clean. From then on, this tax haven served to strategically take over the health sector in the USA.
The Rockefeller Foundation formed the front organization for a new global business project: the pharmaceutical investment business. Donations from the Rockefeller Foundation flowed into medical colleges and hospitals, which were turned into missionaries of the new corporate form: They advertised patented, synthetic drugs to their patients.
At the time, however, there were also researchers such as the two-time Nobel Prize winner Linus Pauling who did not want to resign themselves to restricting themselves to curing symptoms, but preferred other natural approaches. Pauling did a lot of research with vitamin C and lysine C, to which he ascribed a vital benefit, which, however, were not patentable for the pharmaceutical industry and therefore offered no profit in prospect.
Vitamins Not Profitable Enough?
The knowledge of vitamins and their effectiveness was contrary to the interests of the pharmaceutical industry then as now, as they would destroy any major investments in the field of patented drugs. Since there was no prospect of profit, vitamins have been demonized again and again since then, although every child already learns how healthy vitamins are.
So in 1918, the Rockefeller Foundation used the media during the Spanish flu period to make vitamins go bad. Even then, the media were willing mouthpieces for donors. Rather, people should buy expensive drugs from the pharmaceutical industry and firmly believe that only they mean well. In the next 15 years, virtually all medical schools in the USA, as well as most clinics and the American Medical Association, became figures on Rockefeller’s chessboard, who dreamed of dominating the entire health sector with his pharmaceutical products. The pharmaceutical industry was constantly given a “Mother Theresa” image by the media it bought, so that no one should doubt that the pharmaceutical industry means well with you.
In 1925, the first chemical / pharmaceutical cartel was founded in Germany, which thwarted Rockefeller’s desire for global control of the pharmaceutical market. With companies like Bayer, BASF and Hoechst, the IG Farben cartel had a total of more than 80,000 employees. The race for global supremacy was on.
Renewed division of the world into zones of interest
On November 29, 1929 there was a meeting between the Rockefeller and IG Farben cartels, where it was decided to divide the world into interests. Rockefeller had been convicted 18 years earlier for the exact same offense, as he had also divided the USA into “zones of interest”!
The agreement lasted until 1932/33. Then the IG Farben cartel decided to no longer adhere to the agreements and supported an aspiring politician in Germany who promised the IG Farben cartel to subjugate the world by military means. The IG-Farben cartel financed this politician’s election campaigns with millions of Reichsmarks, thereby enabling him to seize power. You can guess who we’re talking about. Democracy was then abolished in favor of dictatorship. The result was a war that killed millions.
In every country that the Wehrmacht invaded at that time, one of the first acts was to seize the chemical, petrochemical and pharmaceutical industries and transfer them to the IG Farben empire and incorporate them without compensation.
When the IG-Farben cartel then planned to have drugs patented globally, the effectiveness of the chemicals was tested on prisoners in the concentration camps in Auschwitz, Dachau and many other locations between 1942 and 1945. These human experiments were financed directly from the bank accounts of Bayer, Hoechst and BASF. A lot of money flowed into the accounts of the SS, which ran these concentration camps.
After the war ended, the Rockefeller group benefited
In 1945 the IG Farben plan failed due to the intervention of the Allies. The price for this was high: many soldiers of the Americans and other allies lost their lives in this conflict. Others reaped the war profit: The economic shares of the losers – IG Farben – went to the Rockefeller Group (USA) and Rothschild / JP Morgan (Great Britain).
In 1947, 24 directors from Bayer, BASF, Hoechst and other executives of the IG Farben cartel were brought to justice in the Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunal for crimes against humanity. They were charged with the following crimes: waging a war of aggression, enslavement and mass murder. In his closing speech, the US chief prosecutor Telford Taylor summed up the crimes committed by the criminal pharmaceutical companies with the following words: “Without IG Farben, the Second World War would not have been possible.”
Amazingly, IG Farben managers responsible for the deaths of 60 million people received the mildest sentences. Even managing directors who were directly responsible for crimes in Auschwitz were only given a maximum of twelve years in prison.
Nelson Rockefeller had already joined the US government in 1944. He began as Undersecretary of State and within a few years rose to become President Truman’s Special Adviser on Special Affairs. From then on, at decisive moments of the 20th century, Rockefeller interests sat at the table and had a direct influence on politics. With the direct influence of the US State Department, the judgments of Nuremberg against the IG Farben managers are easy to explain. Nelson Rockefeller made sure that the real culprits in World War II were not executed because they were still needed.
Manager reinstated after imprisonment
In 1949 the Federal Republic of Germany was founded. Within just a few years, the IG Farben officials convicted in Nuremberg were released from prison and resumed their former positions in the pharmaceutical companies as if nothing had ever happened. This time, however, they represented Rockefeller interests. For example, Fritz Ter Meer was sentenced to twelve years in prison for his crimes in Auschwitz, but he was Chairman of the Supervisory Board at Bayer AG from 1956 to 1964.
Between 1945 and 1949, the role of the Rockefeller brothers was not limited to taking over the global monopoly in the oil and pharmaceuticals business. Political interests were now also being targeted. Under the influence of the Rockefellers, the United Nations was founded in San Francisco in 1945.
In order to seize political control over the post-war world, three countries – all leading pharmaceutical exporting nations – were given full voting rights in the UN, while 200 other nations only had to accept the role of spectators. Allegedly founded for the good of all people worldwide, the UN sub-organizations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO), quickly emerged as the political arms of the pharmaceutical industry.
Legal campaign against vitamin therapies
In 1963, on behalf of Rockefeller interests, the German government led the most notorious initiative ever taken in the United Nations. Under the guise of consumer protection, it spearheaded a campaign to prohibit vitamin therapies and other natural, non-patentable health procedures. The goal was simply to remove all competition for the multibillion dollar pharmaceutical business. The plan was simple: the worldwide transfer of what had been done in America in the 1920s, namely, to place health care under a monopoly in favor of the pharmaceutical investment business.
Pharmaceutical companies’ profits depend on the persistence of diseases. If the development of drugs were based on prevention, many diseases would not arise in the first place and the main business of the pharmaceutical industry would collapse like a house of cards. The global strategy therefore seems to be to usurp the health of billions of people in order to sell pills that may halfway cover symptoms, but which do not address the causes of the disease. On the one hand, access to vital information about the health benefits of natural healing methods is made more difficult, at the same time a monopoly is achieved on the basis of patented, largely ineffective and often toxic drugs – both together promoted diseases and death to the extent of genocide.Such incapacitation and death as a result of the pharmaceutical business is unprecedented in history. It is thanks to Linus Pauling and other eminent scientists that the door to knowledge about the health benefits of vitamins and other effective natural healing methods could be kept open. From 44,000 pages of the Nuremberg trials it is clear how deeply the pharmaceutical industry was involved in the war. Anyone who knows this information should look at the cry about vaccination in the media today from a different perspective.