Agenda 2030 and the Great Reset endanger our way of life
Building Back Better (BBB) is a Great Reset strategy that purports to reduce the risk to people in nations and communities after disasters. The strategy outlines measures to reduce the disaster risk and includes an alleged restoration of the infrastructure, social systems and accommodation as well as the revitalization of livelihoods, the economy and the environment. In order to rebuild something, however, something must first be destroyed, as is currently the case everywhere in countries with restrictive corona policies.
Joe Biden wasn’t the only one who used the Build Back Better tagline in his advertising campaign to show he was behind the Great Reset plan. To get into the topic well, this article is recommended : “Joe Biden’s disturbing connection to the socialist ‘Great Reset’ movement” which appeared on July 23, 2020 on FOX News. In the USA these projects have been openly discussed for a very long time, while in Canada they are still dismissed as “conspiracy theory” today. Remarkable – when you consider how many top politicians and statesmen talk about it completely openly, wear their symbols and use their codes.
BBB was first officially mentioned in the United Nations Sendai Document. The UN stipulates that the framework is a guide on how disaster risks can be minimized. It was adopted by UN member states on June 3, 2015 as one of four priorities in the Sendai Framework for Disaster Recovery, Risk Reduction and “Sustainable Development”.
Climate change, great reset
The Sendai document emerged from three-years of discussions at the United Nations. The UN, which is actively involved in the Great Reset, set out a framework for post-disaster recovery, including a set of common standards. The UN felt it was necessary for countries to take into account alleged climate change when reconstructing. At the same time, the goals of the Great Reset for “sustainable development” could be implemented. The WEF, which was never elected as a representative by any people, has been in the process of incorporating its goals into the UN for years. Obviously, if you have a lot of money, you also have a lot of power and influence and can influence world politics. The UN Agenda 2030 explicitly includes the plan for a “more sustainable” world, which is why everything must be “rebuilt better”. Reconstruction is part of the Great Reset and is a strategy for restructuring the world order.
The above mentioned article by FOX mentioned: “For several years, WEF and its allies have been talking about “building back better.” It can’t be a coincidence that Biden is now using that exact language while calling for nearly identical policies. Biden is clearly taking his cues from the World Economic Forum and other supporters of the Great Reset. “
As the pictures show, the Build Back Better Program is part of the agenda of many world politicians. All of this in the public eye. The “conspiracy”, if you will, is so great that you can rely on the population neither perceiving nor believing it, even if you make it quite openly.
The “SDG” program has been officially in operation since 2016
The WEF created 17 goals for “sustainable” development which the United Nations aims to set as a political objective worldwide, ostensibly to secure sustainable development on an economic, social and ecological level. They came into force on January 1, 2016 with a term of 15 years (until 2030) and apply to all countries.
Occasionally one also hears the Global Sustainability Agenda, Post-2015 Development Agenda, Global Goals of the UN, World Future Treaty or New World Order NWO. Those who are bothered by the latter term, which is considered a conspiracy theory in Wikipedia, should be reminded that numerous heads of state are now speaking quite openly of a “New World Order”.
UN approval 2012 – before the goals become known
In 2012, the UN member states voted for the goals at the Rio + 20 conference, although the specific goals still had to be formulated at the time. Apparently it was enough for the WEF to submit the proposal for it to be approved. The process makes it clear that the UN receives its specifications from the hands of the WEF.
Central aspects of the 2030 Agenda are allegedly promoting economic growth, reducing differences in living standards, creating “equal opportunities” and “sustainable” management of natural resources, which ensures the preservation of ecosystems and strengthens their resilience.
The Agenda 2030 (Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development) consists of the following elements:
– A short introduction
– Political declaration
– 17 goals for sustainable development (as the core of the 2030 Agenda) plus 169 sub-goals with 107 content-related goals .
– Section on means of implementation and global partnership
Primarily, it appears as if the 2030 Agenda only relates to the level of the nation states; however, the 2030 Agenda is particularly relevant at regional and local level. The 2030 Agenda affects everyone. For example, cities and municipalities are developing local sustainability strategies based on the 17 goals as part of the 2030 Agenda. The goals of the agenda are:
1. End poverty
2. Secure food
3. Healthy life for all
4. Education for all
5. Gender equality
6. Water and sanitation for all
7. Sustainable and modern energy for all
8. Sustainable economic growth and decent work for all
9. Resilient Infrastructure and Sustainable Industrialization
10. Reduce Inequality
11. Sustainable Cities and Settlements
12. Sustainable Consumption and Production
13. Take immediate action to combat climate change and its effects
14. Preservation and sustainable use of oceans, seas and marine resources
15. Land ecosystems protect
17. Strengthen means of implementation and global partnership
What sounds great at first glance is a catalog of measures by the globalists to shape and rule the world regardless of governments according to their wishes and ideas. Voters and democratic votes are insignificant in the agenda, the agenda was passed over all of our heads and applies in all countries in which the UN has influence. If all of it were so wonderful and desirable, it shouldn’t actually be introduced by force, but rather let the people in the democracies vote on it, right?
Peace is not that important
Do you notice that peace comes pretty close to the end? American foundations and organizations wanted to limit the goals of the agenda to economic and humanitarian concerns, whereupon the UN Secretary General António Guterres said in his speech to the United Nations on January 1, 2017: “Let us agree to bring peace (Goal 16) to the front. The importance of goal 16 (peace) has so far been rejected by the USA, the EU and the OECD, while China, India and numerous developing countries support the goal.” The rejection manifests itself by ignoring and not mentioning Goal 16, for example in an OECD paper on the 2030 Agenda.
Despite the fact that the implementation of the 17 UN goals is estimated to cost $2.5 trillion, these goals form the heart of the UN 2030 Agenda, which affects each of us.
Let’s take point 1: Ending poverty sounds great, but how could that be done? The UN could have determined as a simple and quick solution (no less communist) that the super-rich of this world should “distribute their wealth fairly”. But the trillions of this elite should by no means be touched. Instead, industrialized countries should share their wealth so that developing countries can benefit from it. Our money should, for example, conquer poverty in Africa. The super-rich, meanwhile, sit back and watch as our economy is being destroyed so that the economy can then be built in a more “sustainable” way – especially sustainable for the present developing countries – without their unimaginable wealth being touched.
Worsen nutrition in industrialized countries and improve it in developing countries
Point 2 is nothing more than point 1: It is important that we shouldn’t eat so much meat “so that there is more left for Africa and the developing countries”. Here, too, there is no mention in any of the subheadings that the problem of insufficient supply in developing countries could be alleviated through the intervention of the richest and most powerful companies. Only the remaining wealth of the industrialized nations should be redistributed in order to make the world more equal. In truth, everyone is getting poorer. Healthy living for everyone does not mean that we should stay healthy thanks to vitamins. Rather, the profit of the pharmaceutical industry is secured here, which of course does not want to go empty-handed and which is getting richer every day, for example through vaccinations. This fits, for example, the current demand from Bill Gates that mankind should switch 100% to synthetic meat.
Point 5 there is the gender ideology, which should lead to everyone being equal and differences disappearing. The individual becomes irrelevant, people should only serve the collective and act like part of a company. Welcome to communism. Decent work implies that there is too much industry in developed countries but too little in developing countries. The aim of the agenda is therefore also to distribute jobs worldwide, which can only be achieved by distributing the economy, that is, migrating here and relocating to previously poorer countries.
The catalog of measures repeatedly includes the word “sustainable”, which may sound nice at first, but is nothing more than the subtle statement of a global coup. Under the guise of “sustainability”, a world government is to be built and a new world order will emerge in which democracies and elections will become superfluous.
Corona is a pretext to overthrow
It should be clear to everyone that the Corona policy serves to create a time window so that the economy can be adjusted to the above goals during this time. The idea behind this is that developing countries can’t just upgrade themselves so that they are on the same level as industrialized countries. In order for everything to be the same, the industrialized countries have to downgrade. Therefore, we are always told that after Corona nothing will be as it was. We should learn to do without so that developing countries can benefit from it. The people behind the scenes watch as hairdressers, small businesses, etc. fight for their existence. It would be easy for them to implement many of the goals of the UN Agenda 2030 with their own money, but then an important point would be lost: there would be no new world order.
The globalists, who have been influencing politicians around the world for years, no longer want to stand in the background and pull the strings; they want to be in the limelight and form a world government that is supposed to go hand in hand with a new world order. Corona serves to crown the new world government, maybe the name is not a coincidence. It is the duty of every citizen to express criticism and resistance here. In addition, it has to be revealed who has let the globalists buy everything and these people belong before the world court, because they are in the process of adapting world politics to their goals, even though none of us voted for them. Their signs and sayings are used completely openly, none of them tries to disguise themselves. “Build Back Better” is one of them.